{"id":302623,"date":"2007-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-07T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdnews.com\/reader-intends-to-vote-for-change-on-pcpb\/"},"modified":"2007-06-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-07T07:00:00","slug":"reader-intends-to-vote-for-change-on-pcpb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/reader-intends-to-vote-for-change-on-pcpb\/","title":{"rendered":"Reader intends to vote for change on PCPB"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As the Peninsula Community Planning Board election nears, I feel a need to point out a telling comment in Geoff Page&#8217;s letter (appearing in the Beacon on May 31). Mr. Page states: &#8220;&#8230; the board has little, if any, power. I&#8217;ve been on the board a year and have seen us be ignored by the Planning Commission and the City Council on a number of issues we felt strongly about.&#8221; This is a true statement and is indicative of why the community is lobbying for a change. <br \/> The current board has made our Peninsula Community Planning Board irrelevant. No one Downtown listens to the incumbents. This really impacts Point Loma, because we have lost a quasi-official voice to the Planning Board and City Council. A perfect example of their gross incompetence is the mess they made of the March election, which has resulted in a need for Saturday&#8217;s replacement (run-off) election. After a full term on the board, the incumbents should, at the very least, know the bylaws well enough to vet candidates and run an election. <br \/> I plan to vote for change and ask your readers to do likewise. Please turn out at 9 a.m. Saturday, June 9, and turn out the incumbents.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the Peninsula Community Planning Board election nears, I feel a need to point out a telling comment in Geoff Page&#8217;s letter (appearing in the Beacon on May 31). Mr. Page states: &#8220;&#8230; the board has little, if any, power. I&#8217;ve been on the board a year and have seen us be ignored by the [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"11561","_seopress_titles_title":"Reader intends to vote for change on PCPB","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11593,11561],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-302623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-no-images","category-peninsula-beacon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=302623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302623\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=302623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=302623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=302623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}