{"id":298196,"date":"2016-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-16T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdnews.com\/coastal-height-controversy-draws-ire-of-peninsulans\/"},"modified":"2016-09-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-16T07:00:00","slug":"coastal-height-controversy-draws-ire-of-peninsulans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/coastal-height-controversy-draws-ire-of-peninsulans\/","title":{"rendered":"Coastal height controversy draws ire of Peninsulans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A high-profile protest by Peninsulans over a condo development under construction at the corner of Emerson and Evergreen streets is gradually morphing into a referendum on needed reform on city planning procedures to guarantee observance of the 30-foot coastal height limit.<br \/>\nLuego de una protesta comunitaria en el sitio del desarrollo, as\u00ed como de una reuni\u00f3n improvisada al estilo de un ayuntamiento a la que asistieron m\u00e1s de 200 residentes en el Sal\u00f3n Social de UPSES en junio, el trabajo en el proyecto se detuvo temporalmente.<br \/>\nAt issue is Emerson Street Duplexes at 3144 Emerson St., a project involving construction of two, three-story duplexes with garages beneath a total of four dwelling units. Zoning on the property allows up to 19 dwelling units on a single, or consolidated lot.<br \/>\nNearby neighbors, however, are convinced the project exceeds the coastal 30-foot height limit and went into a full-court press to block it.<br \/>\nThe mayor&#8217;s office has committed to being present at the Peninsula Community Planning Board&#8217;s next meeting to take community questions on the Emerson Project 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 15 at Point Loma branch library, 3701 Voltaire St.<br \/>\nPoint Loma planners and residents thought they were making real progress when proposed amendments to the Residential-Multiple Dwelling Unit (RM) Base Zone Height Limit for Properties within the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone was scheduled for a Sept. 8 city Planning Commission hearing.<br \/>\nBut an abrupt postponement of that hearing until Sept. 22, coupled with fears that\u00a0scaffolding going up on the alleged four-story Emerson duplexes was &#8220;preparation for the project to go forward,&#8221; has left outcome of the development \u2014 and the planning issues surrounding it \u2014 in doubt.<br \/>\n&#8220;The way to solve a problem is to talk about it,&#8221; said Jon Linney, chair of Peninsula Community Planning Board (PCPB). &#8220;The Peninsula has a problem, a crisis actually, with out-of-control building and with violations of the 30-foot height limit the community has understood to be in place since 1972.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;The City&#8217;s handling of the Planning Commission meeting and the last-minute cancellation have been less than responsible,&#8221; concurred Linney&#8217;s PCPB colleague and retired journalist Don Sevrens, speaking on his own behalf. &#8220;They are asking us to believe that they didn&#8217;t understand the 72-hour notice requirement of the state Brown Act?\u00a0 That strains credulity.&#8221;<br \/>\nLinney called for renewed community discussion by the Roseville neighborhood of the controversial condo project.<br \/>\n&#8220;What we have known and loved is disappearing overnight without any public hearing, without any elected policy-maker or Planning Department official lifting a finger to ask what is best for the community,&#8221; Linney said. &#8220;We need a public dialogue about public spaces in Roseville, encouraging\u00a0a walkable, bikable residential area. Can we create a municipal parking lot to help address the shortage? Should there be incentives to encourage land aggregation so that builders can be more creative than just shoe-horning multifamily structures onto 50-foot lots?&#8221;<br \/>\nLinney suggested that, in the future, &#8220;all residences in Roseville must be required to go through public hearings.&#8221;<br \/>\nPreviously, Council District 2 representative Lorie Zapf supported the coastal height limit and protecting coastal views.<br \/>\n&#8220;Further review of the municipal code has determined that this (Emerson) project does not conform to the City\u2019s development regulations,&#8221; Zapf said. &#8220;I believe this project is contrary to the intent and integrity of Proposition D (coastal 30-foot height limit passed in 1972). It allows the manipulation of grade on a lot known to be relatively flat, to achieve greater overall height. That is in question.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;Removal of the fourth floor will be a major victory for the community, as will new rules when adopted to make the height limit 30 feet period,&#8221; said Linney. &#8220;The city has committed to making those revisions as quickly as possible.&#8221;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A high-profile protest by Peninsulans over a condo development under construction at the corner of Emerson and Evergreen streets is gradually morphing into a referendum on needed reform on city planning procedures to guarantee observance of the 30-foot coastal height limit. Following a community protest on the site of the development, as well as an [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"11561","_seopress_titles_title":"Coastal height controversy draws ire of Peninsulans","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11551,11593,11561],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-298196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-no-images","category-peninsula-beacon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}