{"id":296614,"date":"2017-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-02-02T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdnews.com\/peninsula-planners-discuss-building-height-limits\/"},"modified":"2017-02-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2017-02-02T08:00:00","slug":"peninsula-planners-discuss-building-height-limits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/peninsula-planners-discuss-building-height-limits\/","title":{"rendered":"Peninsula planners discuss building height limits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In January, the Peninsula Community Planning Board grappled with the vexing issue of the city&#8217;s 30-foot building height limit, with a city official explaining to testy residents why it&#8217;s been so difficult to amend municipal height regulations.<br \/>\nRobert Vacchi, a Point Loma resident who leads the city&#8217;s Development Services Department, discussed city rules governing building heights.<br \/>\nA case in point, cited by Vacchi, is the controversial multi-story development on Emerson and Evergreen in Roseville, which many residents believed exceeded the 30-foot height limit. Many residents have complained that the city&#8217;s municipal code is now too loosely defined governing how \u2013 and where \u2013 a building&#8217;s height limit is measured.<br \/>\nVacchi said it was more difficult to make changes to height limits in this case, because the 30-foot height limit was passed by voters with Proposition D, rather than being an action taken by the San Diego City Council.<br \/>\n&#8220;It was difficult to find a solution, in part because the law is written, not like a (city) ordinance, where you can go back in and fix it through words,&#8221; Vacchi said, noting it was an act passed instead by voters, which he added is tougher to change.<br \/>\n&#8220;A (voter-passed) proposition takes precedent over anything the City Council does,&#8221; Vacchi said adding, &#8220;With existing projects in the pipeline, what California case law says is that, once the city has issued a building permit \u2013 you can&#8217;t change the rules on them.&#8221;<br \/>\nAn audience member called Vacchi out, alleging the city was not being entirely truthful in its stance on height limits.<br \/>\n&#8220;I really find a high level of audacity for you to address this crowd and present us with this convoluted logic that has allowed out-of-character structures to be approved in this community,&#8221; said the resident. &#8220;This has been a deception, and these regulations are for financial gain.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;Nothing can be changed once the stakes are in the ground,&#8221; replied Vacchi.<br \/>\n&#8220;This is a hot-button issue in this community, and you&#8217;re telling us the proposition gives us no wiggle room on it,&#8221; pointed out Peninsula Planning Board member Jim Hare. Hare characterized recent height-limit reform undertaken by the city as &#8220;landmark actions with regard to the protection of this community. I just want to say, &#8216;I appreciate you being here to work through this with us.\u2019&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8220;We were led to believe the city was going to have a moratorium on (questionable) projects,&#8221; said board member Julia Quinn.<br \/>\n&#8220;We had no direction from the City Council to have a moratorium on any building permits,&#8221; responded Vacchi. &#8220;The [city] recommended going through zoning changes and reducing the amount of collateral damage in the process, and we succeeded in that.&#8221;<br \/>\nPCPB meets the third Thursday of the month from 6:30 to 9 p.m. in the community room at Point Loma\/Hervey Branch Library at 3701 Voltaire St.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In January, the Peninsula Community Planning Board grappled with the vexing issue of the city&#8217;s 30-foot building height limit, with a city official explaining to testy residents why it&#8217;s been so difficult to amend municipal height regulations. Robert Vacchi, a Point Loma resident who leads the city&#8217;s Development Services Department, discussed city rules governing building [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"11561","_seopress_titles_title":"Peninsula planners discuss building height limits","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11551,11593,11561],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-296614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-no-images","category-peninsula-beacon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}