{"id":268860,"date":"2018-09-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-09-06T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdnews.com\/new-vacation-rental-ordinance-would-have-huge-impact-for-mission-beach\/"},"modified":"2018-09-06T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-09-06T07:00:00","slug":"new-vacation-rental-ordinance-would-have-huge-impact-for-mission-beach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/new-vacation-rental-ordinance-would-have-huge-impact-for-mission-beach\/","title":{"rendered":"New vacation rental ordinance would have huge impact for Mission Beach"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Short-term vacation-rental owners hard hit by the new City ordinance\u2019s residence-only requirement for them feel &#8220;singled out&#8221; now that Mayor Kevin Faulconer\u2019s proposed &#8220;carve-out&#8221; of Mission Beach has gone down to defeat.<br \/>\nIn July, City Council nixed Faulconer\u2019s less-stringent short-term vacation rental proposal, voting 6-3 instead for tougher rules allowing primary-residence-only rentals with a six-month maximum.\u00a0<br \/>\nThe Council denied both Faulconer\u2019s &#8220;plus one&#8221; provision allowing people to rent out their own residence, and one additional place, as well as the mayor\u2019s proposed &#8220;carve out&#8221; exemption for Mission Beach.<br \/>\nMission Beach has the highest number of short-term rentals \u2013 more than 40 percent \u2013 along the coast. Existing Mission Beach rentals will also not be grandfathered into the new ordinance.<br \/>\nMission Beach vacation-rental owner Blaine Smith, founder of Save Mission Beach (savemb.org), is lobbying against the City\u2019s new rental ordinance, claiming it is unduly harsh and would be disastrous for rental owners.\u00a0<br \/>\n&#8220;The new ordinance will put more than 95 percent of rental owners in Mission Beach out of business, and 80 percent of operators citywide,&#8221; Smith said. &#8220;It will be hard for the industry to survive with regulations that wipe out such a huge chunk of it.&#8221;<br \/>\nSmith noted there was a good reason for Faulconer\u2019s proposed &#8220;carve out&#8221; exemption for Mission Beach, which didn\u2019t make it into the new ordinance.\u00a0<br \/>\n&#8220;No community in San Diego will be impacted by this ban more than Mission Beach, Smith said. &#8220;Mission Beach has always welcomed visitors and has always been a vacation destination and has the highest ratio of short-term vacation rentals in the city \u2013 44 precent. The effects would devastate our community, which has always been supported by visitors and short-term vacation rental accommodations.&#8221;<br \/>\nOf the new short-term rental ordinance, Smith said: &#8220;This is not a workable compromise. It\u2019s a de facto ban.&#8221;<br \/>\nJonah Mechanic, a spokesperson for Share San Diego, a local coalition of short-term rental operators, said the new ordinance will be overly impactful to the San Diego tourism industry and small-business owners who &#8220;just want to protect their property rights and don\u2019t like big government coming in and telling them what they can, and cannot, do with their property.&#8221;<br \/>\nMechanic argued the City\u2019s new rental ordinance is flawed.<br \/>\n&#8220;It doesn\u2019t define what primary residence actually means,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Primary only sounds good, but it will eliminate 95 percent of rental owners who\u2019ve invested in places like Mission Beach.&#8221;<br \/>\nMechanic contends the new ordinance was also passed without sufficient research data, such as how many hotel rooms are in the area, their occupancy and\/or affordability rates. &#8220;They blindly approved a ban without even realizing what the [ordinance] means,&#8221; he said.<br \/>\nMechanic also claims the City\u2019s sixth-month qualification in its new rental ordinance is discriminatory. &#8220;If you\u2019re a rental owner and you live in a house less than six months \u2013 you can\u2019t rent,&#8221; he said. &#8220;But if you live in one for six months and a day \u2013 you can rent it out for the other six months. That\u2019s absurd.&#8221;<br \/>\nSmith\u2019s website says there are approximately 1,560 short-term rentals in Mission Beach, claiming 98 percent of those include the entire home.\u00a0<br \/>\n&#8220;More than 95 percent would be illegal under the new ordinance, devastating local businesses, depleting money critical to San Diego\u2019s budget and punishing responsible property owners,&#8221; savemb.org claims.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Short-term vacation-rental owners hard hit by the new City ordinance\u2019s residence-only requirement for them feel &#8220;singled out&#8221; now that Mayor Kevin Faulconer\u2019s proposed &#8220;carve-out&#8221; of Mission Beach has gone down to defeat. In July, City Council nixed Faulconer\u2019s less-stringent short-term vacation rental proposal, voting 6-3 instead for tougher rules allowing primary-residence-only rentals with a six-month [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":268856,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"11559","_seopress_titles_title":"New vacation rental ordinance would have huge impact for Mission Beach","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11559,11551],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-beach-bay-press","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268860\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}