State laws making it easier to build granny flats to alleviate the housing crisis have some beach residents complaining of loopholes and over densification.
\nAnd so-called granny flats, otherwise known as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) or companion units, are increasingly coming before, and under fire during, neighborhood planning review.
\nThe City has made it easier \u2014 and less expensive \u2014 to create companion units. The City Council unanimously voted to waive development impact fees, facility benefit assessment fees and general plan maintenance fees for the construction of companion units. This has impacted their development. A recent study found granny flat permits in San Diego increased by 71 percent between 2016 and 2017.
\nMayor Kevin Faulconer and District 7 Councilmember Scott Sherman are spearheading granny-flat streamlining and cost-cutting.
\n“One of the fastest and least expensive ways we can increase affordable housing in San Diego is to make it easier to build granny flats, build more housing that people can actually afford,” Faulconer said. “With these new incentives, we\u2019re removing barriers to encourage the construction of new units that San Diegans can actually afford.”
\nSherman concurred contending housing shortages are “literally forcing the next generation of San Diegans to move outside the region.”
\nDistrict 2 community planners, like Henish Pulickal and Karl Rand of Pacific Beach Planning Group, and architect Mark Krencik of Peninsula Community Planning Board, noted more granny flats are being reviewed \u2014 with more on the way.
\nPCPB president Pulickal, speaking on his own behalf, believes that\u2019s mostly good.
\n“ADUs are a great step in the right direction to ameliorate the housing crisis facing San Diego and all of California,” Pulickal said.\u00a0“Rent control doesn’t make sense.\u00a0Building more units does.”
\nAdded Pulickal: “ADUs are a solution that we need to get behind because housing prices are basically a result of supply and demand. When we have more units available for people to live in, that will slow down the rate of rent increases, making California a more affordable state for more people.”\u00a0\u00a0
\nPulickal noted a granny-flat project came through PB planning review recently wherein neighbors “didn’t want the granny flat because the primary house is used as a vacation rental by an investor owner.”\u00a0
\nPB board member Rand concurred that such situations are becoming commonplace \u2014 and more problematic.
\n“We really do have a split between the old school who don\u2019t want greater density, and the more forward-looking who say, \u2018We need to have density, work with the flow and control things.\u2019”
\nRand noted a community planner\u2019s purview is limited. “Our primary function is to provide a public forum where applicants have to walk through the process and face the public,” he said.
\nAdded Rand: “We\u2019ve had a number of situations where either a board member, or the public, spoke out against [granny-flats]. We\u2019ve even had developers go back and redraw and redesign the things.”
\nArchitect Mark Krencik, a Peninsula Community Planning Board member, has chaired the group\u2019s subcommittee reviewing new development projects for four years. He agreed new state laws relaxing requirements for granny flats are causing more and more of them to be proposed and built.
\n“In the last year or two we\u2019ve reviewed about 12 companion units, but about 50 percent of those have been in the last six months,” Krencik said. “There have been some that have had questionable types of parking arrangements.”
\nSpeaking as an architect, Krencik pointed out new state laws regarding granny flats are fundamentally changing the rules governing their size, cost and whether parking is required for them.
\n“What\u2019s come down in the new laws is that granny flats are now allowed to be up to 50 percent the size of the primary dwelling,” Krencik said. “So if you have a 2,400-square-foot house, you can have a 1,200-square-foot companion unit. That\u2019s a nice-sized, two-bedroom condo.”
\nAdded Krencik: “There used to be a one-space-per-bedroom parking requirement. But with the new rules, parking is exempt if the companion unit is 500 square feet or less, or if it\u2019s in Transit Priority Area (trolley and bus corridors).”
\nThe upshot is granny flats are here to stay, and rules governing them will have to be tweaked to address problems arising from them moving forward.
\n“The reality is the mayor\u2019s behind it, the City Council seems to be behind it, and the state is asking us to do it,” Krencik said. “Our planning board will be taking this on next year. And the topics will be what we want and don\u2019t want about [granny flat regulations], and what we can do about it.”\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
State laws making it easier to build granny flats to alleviate the housing crisis have some beach residents complaining of loopholes and over densification. And so-called granny flats, otherwise known as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) or companion units, are increasingly coming before, and under fire during, neighborhood planning review. The City has made it easier […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":258218,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"11559","_seopress_titles_title":"Granny flats, or companion units, increasing in San Diego to help alleviate housing crisis","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11559,11551],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-258217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-beach-bay-press","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258217"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258217\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/258218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}