Earlier this month, Target Corp., the nation\u2019s second largest discount retailer, announced plans to open a location in the mid-city neighborhood of South Park.<\/p>\n
The corporation will open a TargetExpress, a miniature version of a typical Target outlet, at 3030 Grape St., the current site of Gala Foods, which will close after 26 years on Oct. 18. Through a commercial real estate broker, Gala Foods owners, who plan on retaining ownership of the property and leasing it to Target, also plan to put a second, smaller building on the same parcel as TargetExpress. Such a building likely wouldn\u2019t be open until late 2016, said the brokers, Flocke & Avoyer<\/p>\n Target\u2019s lease is expected to begin in November after the current store shutters. It will then undergo interior renovations before opening in July 2015, according to their press release.<\/p>\n The timeline for the future of the site depends on whether the city requires ministerial review or discretionary review of the changes. Ministerial review is a relatively straightforward process of submitting documents and obtaining rubber-stamp approval from the city. Discretionary review is a far more arduous and time-consuming process that often requires community input, public hearings and votes.<\/p>\n The property is located in a commercial zone that makes discretionary review likely for commercial developments \u2014 even when a new tenant plans to use the location for the same purpose as their predecessor \u2014 if they make changes to the site.<\/p>\n Lynda Pfeifer, a spokesperson for the city\u2019s Development Services Department, said the degree of review will not be determined until Target submits their plans to the city. A Target spokesperson declined to answer questions about specific changes the company would make to the space, or when it would submit plans for city review.<\/p>\n Laurie Fisher, a local architect with 15 years of experience in the area, said that based on her experience, discretionary review will likely be required because of the zone it’s located in.<\/p>\n \u201cI worked with a restaurant in the area where all they did was paint the exterior and change the sign, and we still had to go through the planning group,\u201d Fisher said.<\/p>\n Council President Todd Gloria, who represents South Park on the City Council, released a statement saying that from a preliminary standpoint, it did not appear discretionary review would be required. Because TargetExpress will not change the use of the store, it will likely only require ministerial review.<\/p>\n \u201cSince this is not a regular model for the company, the template will not mirror the standard company format, and they will be incorporating some creative elements within the store,\u201d Gloria stated. \u201cI have asked that they reach out to the community and provide additional information about the project. As this process moves forward I will continue to engage with Target to ensure that the community\u2019s voice is heard.\u201d<\/p>\n Fisher\u2019s biggest concern with the space is its potential impact on traffic. Many community members have pointed to the intersection of Fern and Grape streets, an already problematic four-way stop stretched around one corner of the proposed site.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m assuming a TargetExpress is going to draw people from Downtown; it\u2019s going to draw people from Bankers Hill and Hillcrest,\u201d Fisher said. \u201cSo it would significantly increase the traffic at that intersection, that\u2019s my main concern. I would hope that they require them to do a traffic study and explain how they\u2019re going to manage all the traffic coming to the store.\u201d<\/p>\n In Gloria\u2019s statement, he said the burden of mitigating potential traffic increases would not fall on Target, because the there is no \u201cchange of use\u201d on the property.<\/p>\n Even in ministerial review, the city can require developers to provide community amenities. Fisher said the city could potentially require Target to mitigate any impacts it might have on traffic.<\/p>\n Since the Gala Foods building is more than 45 years old, a historical review will also likely be required on the site. If anything is deemed historically significant about the site, it could limit what Target could alter about the space, although the corporation stated that it does not plan to change the exterior fa\u00e7ade.<\/p>\n Extra baggage<\/strong><\/p>\n Gala Foods owner Saad Hirmez told U-T San Diego that the large amount of renovations needed on the site motivated him to lease out the property. He estimated the cost of such renovations would fall between $3 and $4 million.<\/p>\n What may further complicate matters for both Hirmez and Target are the three other businesses that currently operate on the plot: a recycling center, a food truck and a drive-thru coffee stand.<\/p>\n Fisher said code complaints were submitted to the city regarding the recycling center and the drive-thru coffee stand for not receiving proper permits prior to operating. The city\u2019s Code Enforcement Department did not respond to an inquiry about the status of such claims by the time of this article\u2019s publication, though Pfeifer of the Development Services Department confirmed that there was an active code case on the site, but could not specify what it pertained to. She said such complaints would have to be addressed during the city\u2019s review of Target\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n Gloria stated that Target plans to keep all three businesses operating on the site<\/p>\n![\"IMG_0173web\"](\"https:\/\/sduptownnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/IMG_0173web.jpg\")
<\/a>