{"id":238037,"date":"2015-10-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-02T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdnews.com\/the-double-edged-sword-of-the-convention-center-study\/"},"modified":"2015-10-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-02T07:00:00","slug":"the-double-edged-sword-of-the-convention-center-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/the-double-edged-sword-of-the-convention-center-study\/","title":{"rendered":"The \u2018double-edged sword\u2019 of the Convention Center study"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bolstering the case for waterfront expansion<\/strong><\/p>\n

By Ashly McGlone | Voice of San Diego<\/p>\n

A new study released [the last week of August]\u00a0bolstered the case for a waterfront expansion<\/a>\u00a0to the San Diego Convention Center and even persuaded Mayor Kevin Faulconer to support a tax hike to fund the project. But the same study might undermine the project in court.<\/p>\n

California\u2019s environmental laws require officials peddling big projects to seek out ways to remove or lessen the negative effects. Projects on the coast are extra sensitive, but special exceptions are made when no viable alternatives exist.<\/p>\n

\"convention<\/a>
The San Diego Convention Center (Courtesy SanDiego.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It was under this premise that the board of the California Coastal Commission approved the waterfront Convention Center expansion in October 2013\u00a0over the objections of its own staff, who noted, \u201cThere are feasible alternatives to the proposed expansion that have not been incorporated into the project, or even fully examined.\u201d<\/p>\n

Commission staff advised the project would harm public views and access, and \u201cresult in the building towering over and dominating the narrow public corridor, making the shoreline feel like the private backyard of the SDCC.\u201d<\/p>\n

A lawsuit challenging the commission\u2019s approval seizes on those same concerns, and alleges the board abused its discretion. It also takes issue with the project \u201cnot being located, designed and constructed to minimize substantial adverse environmental impact.\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, consultant Conventions, Sports & Leisure International has provided\u00a0a head-to-head comparison of the planned coastal expansion and an alternate city-owned location a half-mile away known as Tailgate Park. Though the study\u2019s authors concluded the contiguous expansion along the coast was preferred and could attract more events, they showed Tailgate could work too and would also increase the number of meetings held in San Diego, though to a lesser degree.<\/p>\n

That means that while officials are defending the waterfront expansion as the only feasible option in court \u2014 the new study seems to show the city would benefit from a split expansion, too.<\/p>\n

Tailgate Park was considered and dismissed by a\u00a0citizen task force in 2009\u00a0primarily for not meeting large convention needs in one spot. The site was deemed infeasible and not thoroughly studied in the project\u2019s Environmental Impact Report \u2014 a key document required by the state and cited in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

\"VOSD<\/a>
(Click to enlarge)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With the new study in hand, attorney Cory Briggs is feeling good about\u00a0his case on behalf of the San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe city and the Port were lying to the public and most importantly, lied to the Coastal Commission by saying the only viable option was a contiguous expansion. \u2026 Their mantra was \u2018contiguous is the only viable option. The clientele won\u2019t go across the street.\u2019 You now have a report that says you can go across the street.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIt disproves the premise in their argument,\u201d Briggs said. \u201cNow we have a report that can get you 22 out of 28 events you want to get.\u201d<\/p>\n

The $90,000 CSL analysis estimated a Tailgate campus expansion would attract 11 more small conventions, three less than a contiguous expansion; seven more mid-size conventions, or one less than a contiguous expansion; one less large event, compared with one more large event gained with a contiguous expansion; and four more corporate events at either location.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s unclear is whether the judge in the case will allow the report into evidence this late in the game.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe city attorney\u2019s office is going to wage World War III to try to keep us from showing this document to the judge because of the lies in the position they took, the Port took to the Coastal Commission,\u201d Briggs said. \u201cThe judge won\u2019t look too kindly to public agencies committing fraud on the public.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will evaluate whether there is any potential relevance and address it in court if need be,\u201d said Gerry Braun, a spokesman for the city attorney\u2019s office.<\/p>\n

Officials with the Port of San Diego \u2014 the lead agency for the project\u2019s environmental approvals \u2014 did not respond to requests for comment.<\/p>\n

California Coastal Commission spokeswoman Noaki Schwartz declined to comment on the legal case, but said in a statement: \u201cThe commission approved the amendment to the Port Master Plan providing for the Convention Center expansion finding that the expansion was consistent with the visual, public access and recreational policies of the Coastal Act.\u201d She said staff hasn\u2019t read the study, \u201cbut would certainly consider its findings if the Port were to come forward with a future amendment to revise the current Port Master Plan.\u201d<\/p>\n

In its\u00a0press release\u00a0announcing the report\u2019s findings Aug. 31, Convention Center officials said the court case may be resolved in the next six months, an estimate that doesn\u2019t include subsequent appeals.<\/p>\n

Other officials, including Convention Center Chairman Steve Cushman, have previously estimated the case could take five more years to resolve.<\/p>\n

\u2014Ashly is an investigative reporter for Voice of San Diego. She can be reached at <\/em>ashly.mcglone@voiceofsandiego.org<\/em><\/a>\u00a0or 619-550-5669.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bolstering the case for waterfront expansion By Ashly McGlone | Voice of San Diego A new study released [the last week of August]\u00a0bolstered the case for a waterfront expansion\u00a0to the San Diego Convention Center and even persuaded Mayor Kevin Faulconer to support a tax hike to fund the project. But the same study might undermine […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":726,"featured_media":238038,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"The \u2018double-edged sword\u2019 of the Convention Center study","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11547,11551,11600],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-features","category-news","category-sdnews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238037\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/238038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.sdnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}