• en_US
  • es_MX
  • About Us
Saturday, December 13, 2025
No Result
View All Result

  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Arts Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Publications
  • Business Directory
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Staff Writers
  • Subscriptions/Support
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Education
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Business Directory
  • Expert Advice
  • Real Estate
  • Report News
SDNews.com
Home News

Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross

Tech by Tech
December 22, 2009
in News, No Images, Peninsula Beacon
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0 0
A A
0
0
SHARES
8
VIEWS

The Mount Soledad Cross still stands but the battle to remove it from public property rages on. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit heard the case on Dec. 9, but no decision is imminent since the three judges are waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the Mojave cross case “Salazar vs. Buno.” The Supreme Court will hear the case sometime between now and June.  However, neither opponents nor supporters of the Mount Soledad Cross seem to think the Mojave case will influence the Mount Soledad case, saying the Mojave case will likely be decided on a technicality. Both opponents and supporters of the cross believe the appellate court gave them a fair hearing on Dec. 9. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) brought the case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in an appeal to a 2008 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Larry Alan Burns that the cross is constitutional because it “communicates the primarily non-religious messages of military service, death and sacrifice.” The ACLU represents the Jewish War Veterans, as well as plaintiffs and San Diegans Steve Trunk, Judith Copeland and La Jollans Richard A. Smith and Mina Sagheb. The appellate court gave the ACLU a fair hearing, according to ACLU attorney Daniel Mach. Defendants in the case include the U.S. Justice Department, City of San Diego and the Mount Soledad Memorial Association. The Alliance Defense Fund, a coalition of Christian attorneys, submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the hearing. Joe Infranco, a senior attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, believes the outcome for the Mount Soledad Cross will be affected by the Supreme Court’s decision in 2005 to permit a statue of the Ten Commandments to remain on public property in Texas due to its historical significance. “My impression is that the panel was attempting to reconcile its old views with the Supreme Court precedent, which is now very favorable to the cross,” Infranco said. “This is a panel that, based on its history, would not be friendly to our perspective. Any panel, regardless of each judge’s philosophy, is still bound by Supreme Court decisions.”   A brief history A cross has stood on Mount Soledad since 1913. The first redwood cross was either stolen or destroyed, and the second one blew down in 1952. The Mount Soledad Memorial Association thus formed to erect the 29-foot cross (atop a 14-foot concrete base). During an Easter Sunday ceremony in 1954, the La Jolla Town Council dedicated the cross to veterans of World Wars I and II and the Korean War. War veteran and atheist Philip Paulson first sued the city in 1989 over the constitutionality of the Mount Soledad Cross on city property. Ten years later, the Mount Soledad Memorial Association built a veterans memorial and has sold 2,600 granite plaques to the public to honor veterans.    Hear the arguments To hear an audio recording of the hearing before the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit visit www.ca9.uscourts.gov, click on “audio recording” and scroll through the cases to Dec. 9, and click on “Jewish War Veterans of the Uni vs. City of San Diego,” case no. 08-56415. 

Previous Post

Letters to the editor

Next Post

Auto Show showcases cars before the hard sell

Tech

Tech

Related Posts

A red wood gavel
News

Murder trial for North Park stabbing moves forward

by Neal Putnam
May 7, 2023
sdsu housing
Mission Valley News - News

Developer selected for first affordable housing project at SDSU Mission Valley

by SDNEWS Staff
April 12, 2023
balboapark
Downtown News

April news briefs from in and around San Diego

by SDNEWS Staff
April 11, 2023
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross
Downtown News

Town hall: America’s largest landlord raises rent, evicts tenants in SD

by Juri Kim
April 10, 2023
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross
Downtown News

Traffic safety campaign launches with posters at intersections where people died

by Juri Kim
April 7, 2023
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross
Downtown News

Local chapter of “Banking on Our Future” protest big banks’ fossil fuel ties

by Juri Kim
April 5, 2023
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross
News

Two rare Amur leopards born at zoo

by SDNEWS Staff
March 28, 2023
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross
News

Community planning groups now required to meet in person

by Dave Schwab
March 8, 2023
Next Post
Appeals court set to rule on fate of Soledad Cross

Auto Show showcases cars before the hard sell

[adinserter block="1"]
  • Business Directory
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Staff Writers
  • Subscriptions/Support
  • Publications
  • Report News

CONNECT + SHARE

© Copyright 2023 SDNews.com Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • en_US
  • es_MX
  • Report News

© Copyright 2023 SDNews.com Privacy Policy